Should people who have lower income own a dog? Should people who rent own a dog? These are questions many dog owners have asked and the answers, or opinions, vary greatly. What follows are my own thoughts on dog ownership for people who have limited income.

First, I’m not ashamed to fall into a ‘low income’ bracket. Currently, I’m a student and a mother. My family survives on one income. Before that I worked hard, long-hours at a job that paid little but gave me a lot of professional satisfaction. I’m well-educated and come from a family of educators. Does that matter? No. But I share it to show that I do not fall into the stereotypes some people have of low income individuals.

The main concern that people express when they hear of a low income person, or family, adopting a dog is the cost. Dogs are expensive. Aren’t they? There is the cost of food, deworming, vaccinations, routine check-ups, toys, training, treats, accessories and then the seemingly inevitable emergency situation(s). How can people on a budget justify this expense? It’s a good question. But it’s also a question that any dog owner could ask. Money is money regardless of how much a person has. People spend (waste?) money on many things that their neighbours/family just can’t wrap their minds around. So maybe the question is if a dog offers something that makes it worthwhile. Any dog will lover will give a hearty ‘yes’ to that question.

A dog offers you companionship, love, friendship, entertainment and even protection (or the illusion of protection). They teach children responsibility and give them a true friend when everyone else seems to fail.

Ok, so maybe the expensive is worthwhile, but is it fair for the dog?

Fair to the dog? Ah, what if that ominous emergency situation arises and the owner isn’t able to find the funds. That is a good question. Many dog owners would mortgage their homes to get their dogs the medical care they needed. While others have a limit in their minds and will not pass it regardless of what kinds of what funds they have available. I think the better question here is the quality of home the dog is given.

Here are two examples.

Family A is on a limited income but they decide to adopt Rover from a kill shelter where he was going to meet certain death. Rover goes home with them and lives for many happy years as part of their family. All his basic needs are met but more importantly he’s surrounded by family that love him. Unfortunately, Rover is diagnosed with cancer before his time. It’s operable but the family just can’t pull the funds together. They decide to put Rover to sleep before he starts to suffer.

Should Family A have adopted Rover? It’s my personal opinion that Rover was a lucky dog. His life was spared and he lived his remaining years with a family that loved him. In the end they decided not to let him suffer. It would be ideal if they had been able to provide him the treatment he needed but I think the quality of his life is marginally more important that the length.

Family B has an average income and they adopt Spot because they feel a dog provides an element of protection. However, they believe that Spot is “just a dog.” Spot is not treated poorly and all his basic needs are met. But he is left largely alone in the yard as a watch dog and is only walked a few times a week. He is not an unhappy dog but he is lonely. Unfortunately, Spot is hit by a car when he escapes from the yard. The family has the money in their savings account to save spot but decide it would eat into their ski vacation so they have Spot put down.

Should Family B have adopted Spot? … I don’t know. But what I DO believe is that they did not provide a better home for Spot than Family A did for Rover despite the difference in income. What if Family B had paid for Spot’s surgery? Would that make a difference?

My point is that the quality of the home provided is not necessarily stipulated by the amount of money the owner makes. I would rather see dogs getting rescued from shelters, loved and cared for even if the families don’t have a canine emergency fun. As long as the love is there and the basic needs are met anyone should be able to have a dog.

Does that mean that all lower income people should go out and get a dog? No. Not at all. There are still many factors to consider. Especially if people rent.

The size of dog is an important one. Bigger dogs will eat more and if you rent it will be harder to find a rental unit. Even things like dewormer and flea repellent cost more for big dogs. It’s also harder to rent with breeds that have fallen into the ‘dangerous dog’ category. Licenses for certain breeds of dogs can be more expensive as well. Some breeds are more likely to need medical attention down the road. Long-haired breeds may require more grooming tools or even special trips to the groomer. And smaller breeds are not necessarily easier. They do eat less but some of them can be quite chatty which can annoy your neighbours if you are in an apartment. There is also the chance that you get a dog that is unhealthy, or has ongoing health problems. Potential dog owners should consider this option and think about how they would handle it.

Everyone should consider all the factors before getting a dog. And if you have read any of my personal blog entries on this site you’ll know I’ve learned the hard way that this includes planning for the unforeseeable future.

A final thought…. there are some things that people can do to prepare for having a dog. Setting aside $10 a month into a canine emergency fund could help you down the road. Investing in a medical plan for your dog might also be worthwhile but be wary of the different plans out there as some are quite expensive and may cost more in the long run.

This blog entry is simply meant to be food for thought. I’ve seen people judged for owning a dog when they couldn’t easily pay emergency vet bills. Yet their dogs had the kind of love that all dogs deserve.

-Shara JJ Cooper

If you read Maverick’s Story you know a little about my past dog ownership and how new I was to owning a dog full time. This was still true when Mikey came into our lives less than a year later.

Maverick was a big dog lover. He wanted to romp and play with everything he saw. We even had pet rabbits that he was gentle with and would ‘play’ with – in his own way. But dogs … he would be hysterically happy to play with other dogs.

Less than a year after we got Maverick we moved up to Northern British Columbia. I was starting a new job and felt like we could settle in this area. It was beautiful. We were in a ‘bowl’ surrounded by mountains and rivers. No matter where you lived you were only steps from the edge of town and there were so many places for Maverick to go exploring.

This small city did not have an animal rescue, only a city shelter. A kill shelter where, despite the employees best efforts, many animals were destroyed throughout the year. We stumbled upon it by accident while exploring the back streets of town. We wandered in and were amazed at how cheap the animals were. Dogs were $40 and cats were $10. Among the many heart-wrenching faces was one that we could not turn away from. Much like when we adopted Maverick the year before we knew that Mikey would be coming home with us. He had particularly caught my SO’s attention.

Mikey had large, brown sad eyes and would fawn all kinds of attention on anyone who wanted it. He was quite different from Maverick in that way. Maverick loved us but he was so independent. He’d come and sniff or lick us and then carry on his way. Mikey wanted to be a lap dog despite being about 60 lbs at this time.

Many people would have labelled him a ‘pit bull.’ But he was far from the breed description of an American Pit Bull Terrier. It wasn’t likely that he was a purebred anything. We called him a Staffie (Staffordshire Terrier) mix. I suspected he was mixed with lab. He was large and as he gained weight and muscle with us he rounded out at about 80 lbs. He was docked and unneutered (we quickly fixed that). He would be heartbroken to be separated from us at any point and would try to sleep in our bed whenever he thought he could. If he sat next to us on the couch he would always lean on us or at the very least put a paw on. He always needed some human connection.

Despite his differences from Maverick he was a great play friend for him and they would romp all day together. They definitely helped each other burn off energy. They both seemed content in our family.

When we first got Mikey we were initially renting a small place on the edge of town where we could walk them along the river. In the winter we’d skate (in our boots) along a frozen creek to reach the river and they would play along the edges and slide across the ice. Sometimes we’d hike through the snow along the trail but many times we’d build a small fire on the river’s edge and SO and I would talk while the dogs ran and explored. It was very remote and quiet and I don’t remember ever running into anyone out there during those cold winter months. The dogs loved it but I missed having a fenced yard for them to play in while I was in the house. I worked from home and wanted to be able to let them out to play while I made phone calls or did some writing. Not only that but Mikey was showing signs of dog aggression with the neighbours dog and I thought it would be best if he had a more controlled environment. So we moved again.

This time we rented a house with a large fully fenced backyard. It wasn’t much farther from where we used to live. But the yard made a huge difference. The fence was six feet high and solid. It was large and the dogs really enjoyed playing in it. We’d toss the balls for them and bring home stuffy toys for them to destroy. I put a kiddie pool out there for them to enjoy but that was not a success. And of course we’d still go exploring the wilderness.

The city’s dog shelter was only a few blocks from us and I really wanted to help those dogs. Sometimes we’d go and walk the dogs. I also started photographing a ‘Dog and Cat of the Week’ and posting them around town. My job was going well. I was working in a beautiful area, from home, as a reporter – the field I had trained in. I liked the kind of writing I was doing and was felt like we had found some place to call home. Even though we were still renting we hoped to buy a few years down the road. And the house we were renting was affordable and provided a great home, secure, home for our dogs and cats.

For many months I resisted bringing home any dogs from the shelter. I volunteered there and they knew us well. But there was one dog that had caught my attention. Nanook. Her story is to come in a future blog entry so I will only tell you that she was there for many months and I felt her time was running out at this kill shelter. Mikey at this time was feeling comfortable in his role in our family and did not welcome new dogs. I didn’t know if he would accept Nanook. We took them for a long walk together and they glared at each other for much of it. When we got back to the shelter we were still unsure but they sat next to each other and Nanook leaned over and licked the inside of his mouth. He tolerated it and she came home with us. He was a little peeved at first but soon began to enjoy his new playmate.

Now we were a family with three large dogs. But with the big yard and open wilderness I still felt confident that we could juggle these creatures. And I was happy being surrounded by so much canine love.

Things did not stay this way. The economy where we lived was struggling. It had been this way for several years after the city’s mill had closed. Many people moved away. I knew that my newspaper was having a hard time for several months but I did not know it was struggling so much. In the spring I got news that it was going under and we only had a month of work left. I was shocked. I had put some new furniture on layaway. We had a comfortable home and I did not want such a big change. The only other newspaper in town was not hiring. I tried to get some regular freelance work but it was hard work and I rarely sold anything. I applied at retail stores and at customer service jobs. I even tried to sell some of the jewellery I make at the farmer’s markets and craft fairs. I didn’t have any success. My SO was working but on one income we were barely getting by. I started applying for jobs out of the area. I got several hits from Alberta, the neighbouring province, and even had two newspapers hoping to hire me. I chose the one largely because it sounded like it had large amounts of remote wilderness and lots of lakes for Maverick to go swimming.

We moved again. But this move was not everything I had hoped it would be. The economy was thriving compared to where we had come from. There were few places to rent and even fewer that were dog friendly. We had to rent a house 45 minutes outside of town. That was over an hour and a half each day during optimal conditions. I was working 12-14 hours a day without any days off and writing stories that I wasn’t familiar with. The yard was fenced but it wasn’t fenced for dogs. We didn’t know what to do with them during the day. We couldn’t tie them up and leave them all day. It wasn’t fair to lock them up all day and even though we were renting a house that was on a quarter section of land we didn’t think it was fair to let them run free when we had no control where they ended up. Many mornings they took this decision from us when we let them out to potty. They would take off in the morning. I would be late for work looking for them but there was so much wilderness it was sometimes an impossible feat. I tried to set up a rotation or put them on lines just to potty in the morning but with four dogs, an early morning shift, and a long commute it was impossible. And they would be squirrley by the time we got home. I wanted to buy a large, outdoor kennel for them but we had bored a lot of money for the move and we weren’t making enough to cover the cost. After many months we managed to find another place to rent with a shorter commute and fenced yard. The yard was tiny though and we ended up having the same problem. The dogs wouldn’t stay in the yard! Only this was worse, we lived near a highway. It was hectic and caused everyone a lot of stress.

It was in this house that Mikey and Nanook started fighting. It wasn’t anything significant at first. Squabbles here and there. I found it very understandable due to the stress and general chaos that was our lives. But it accelerated. Rapidly. Nanook was always the instigator but Mikey never backed down. The fights got bloody and almost ended at the vet’s clinic a few times. There were not behaviourists in our area. I talked to some online and some friends who were trainers. Again, the long hours of my job worked against us. I bought crates for all the dogs and ended up crating and rotating them. This brought some peace back into my home but I felt bad with them being locked up for so long. I came home whenever I could, sometimes sneaking back when I was on the road for an assignment. The situation was manageable but far from ideal. It wasn’t the home I had imagined when I adopted any of the dogs.

I became pregnant and stopped working a month before the baby was due. Part of me was incredibly relieved to be able to spend some quiet time at home. But I also worried about what would happen when I brought a new baby into the family. We planned on moving back to the Greater Vancouver area where there would be amenities available to us and many more rental options. All the dogs accepted the new baby with little trouble. I still crated and rotated even though I was home all the time. Sometimes I could lock one of the two into the bedroom with me and let the other have run of the house. Everyone seemed happier but the dogs still lacked the exercise they needed. The final months of my pregnancy were difficult and I had trouble at the end resulting in a c-section. It was awhile before I was really moving around enough to take them out on walks. And even then I couldn’t take them all at once and had to bring the baby with me.

We found a house to rent in Greater Vancouver and returned to the city. Because we were so far away we had a family member scout out the house for us before we moved and everything seemed good. It had an extremely large yard and they said it was fully fenced. I imagined that I could sit outside with them and throw a ball, play games, and they could play with each other (Mikey and Nanook separately of course). That way, if I could only walk one or two a day they would still get some exercise. However, once again, when we got there things were not as they seemed. The yard was indeed huge. But we did not have the access we were promised. The landlord ‘changed his mind’ and only let us use a small section. He had a gravel company and wanted to park his trucks there. We looked for another place but anywhere else was a lot more money and we were back on a single income again. So we stayed for almost a year. At least we had some of the yard and there were plenty of places to take the dogs.

The issues that had developed while I was working fulltime followed us back to the city. The dogs were still escape artists. Mikey and Nanook would still fight if not watched carefully or separated although they had gotten much better. But none of them were getting the exercise they needed. Since I was home I was able to go outside with them most of the time and make sure they didn’t pull any Houdini acts. However, there were a few instances where they got away on me. Most of the time they were just milling in the larger yard and I could easily catch them and bring them back. But Mikey ran out onto the street once and was picked up and taken to the shelter. Before I could rescue him he caught kennel cough. They put him in quarantine for a month and would not let me take him out. My heart broke for him. He must have been so alone and scared.

At the same time I could not help but feel a little more relaxed at home. It was much easier to handle two dogs than three. I didn’t have to crate and rotate any dogs and I could walk Maverick and Nanook together. I slowly came to terms with the idea of rehoming one of my dogs. I had never given up an animal in my life and it was a difficult concept to grasp. I also didn’t know if it should be Mikey or Nanook. I felt that Mikey had been there first so he had more rights to stay. He also didn’t initiate the fighting. However, Nanook and I had an incomparable bond. Ultimately, Mikey would adjust the easiest to a new home. He was a real people-lover and was content with anyone that gave him attention.

I knew that if I did this I would have to be extremely picky about the kind of home he went to. I wanted him to be an only dog with someone who would love him and be able to spend the time with him he deserved. He was a very loving, people-oriented dog and if he could have a home where he was appreciated he would be happier than with us. Many people told me that this kind of home was impossible to find. Chances were I would never find it. That was fine. I didn’t really want to give him up and wouldn’t accept a home below my standards.

It took about two months, a shorter time than I expected, before I found someone I thought might be a good option. A woman wanted a companion for her grandmother who had just lost her dog. She had always had a dog and wanted to get another one. She lived on an acreage in the neighbouring city, was home all the time and would take Mikey with her when she went on errands. They wanted to meet him. I loaded him up and drove over never expecting to leave him. When I walked into her house I found myself faced with walls and walls of photos of her past dogs. She spoke of them with great affection. She loved chatting with Mikey and petting him. He had a nervous stomach from the car ride and excitement. He pooped on her floor and she said that was very understandable and wouldn’t let me clean it up. We agreed to do a trial stay and see how it went. It went perfectly. She was hard of hearing so I didn’t talk to her on the phone much. I talked to her granddaughter who said Mikey never left his new mom’s side. She was very pleased with her new companion and even let him sleep in the bed with her. A privilege I don’t think she allowed her previous dogs. They’d go for walks on the country roads together and never had any problems.

I feel at peace with Mikey’s new home and life. I think he is getting the one-on-one attention he deserves and he definitely has room to explore and run.  When writing these articles I’ve been as honest as I can about my experiences with my dogs. Mikey has been with his new family for two and a half years but I’ve done my best to retell his story. I also hope that people learn from my story about how challenging owning multiple dogs can be. And that even though there may seem to be no problems at the start, many can sprout up down the road.

-Shara JJ Cooper

What are interactive dog toys? Is this some new-fangled way to get you to spend money? Perhaps. But they work and just may save your sanity.

There is an old adage “a tired dog is a good dog.” This is as true today as it has ever been. However, not everyone can provide the mental and physical stimulation that a dog needs every day. Which of the dogs in the following examples could benefit from an interactive toy?

Dog A is a young puppy, always chewing on things, playing, running. His owner takes him out for a walk every day. He also has a large yard to play in.

Dog B is a young adult. His owner takes him for a brisk, hour-long walk every day. They cover a lot of distance and he is burns off a lot of energy during this walk.

Dog C has a busy owner who can only walk him every second day. He lives in an apartment so he doesn’t get the free romp he would in a yard.

Dog C is the obvious suspect but in realty all of these dogs could benefit from interactive toys. Dog A would have something to chew on and something to keep him busy when his owner did something other than play with him! Dog B would get the mental stimulation from an interactive toy. Brisk walks are great but if the dog can’t smell and explore most of the exercise he is getting is physical. Dog C is like many dogs and interactive toys will help keep him entertained at home.

Great, but, what are interactive toys?

Interactive toys make the dog work to get a reward. Sometimes they are also called puzzle toys. Many of them dispense treats but the dog has to figure out how to get the treat out. Some of them make noise when the dog figures out how to work them. Here’s an example of some sturdy, popular interactive toys.

The Kong. This is a classic. It comes in many shapes and sizes. There is one for every dog out there. Owners have found many different ways to use the Kong. Some of them use it as a durable chew toy, a fun toy to fetch but when using it as an interactive toy it is usually stuffed with a treat.

Kong sells treats that can be put inside the Kongs. But you are really only limited by your imagination (and what your dog will eat). Kongs are commonly filled with peanut butter. The dog will then have to stick his tongue inside the Kong and slowly lick it out. Peanut butter on its own can take some time to eat. When in a Kong it’s even more time consuming. Other ideas are yogurt, tuna, dog food, and their dinner. If the contents are too sloppy you can freeze them in the Kong and then give them to the dog to eat. This is also great if the dog gets the knack for eating the filling too quickly. Freezing it will slow them down again. Kongs are particularly great for dogs that spend time in a crate.

The JW Hol-ee Mol-ee Roller. This is a great toy. Actually, the JW brand has a many great interactive dog toys. Many people see the Hol-ee Mol-ee and assume it’s just a holey ball. But, like the Kong, you can put treats in those holes. JW makes this toy in a lot of different sizes and shapes. The best one for dogs who are big chewers (or really skilled at interactive toys) is the Hol-ee Molee Extreme. This one is made from thicker rubber and has tighter holes. You have to struggle to get the treats in, which is great because the dogs really work to get them out!

Some ideas for treats are Bully Sticks, compressed rawhide bones (if you can supervise), Greenies, Salmon skins, and larger pieces of frozen meat (natural sausages?).

JW Amazeaball Treat Ball. I wasn’t lying when I said JW made great toys. This is last one I’m going to focus on today. The Treat Ball is similar to the above to. You put food in and the dog rolls it around to get the food out. This food can be snacks throughout the day or you can feed entire meals in the Treat Ball. This is particularly good for dogs who inhale their food as it forces them to slow down.

JW’s Treat Ball comes in various sizes but many brands are starting to carry similar products so you should be able to find something that fits your needs.

There you have it. In a nutshell, interactive toys are good for almost any dog and are widely available and varyied. Happy shopping for your happy canine!

- Shara JJ Cooper

As seen here…

A young man walks his pit bull in an İstanbul park. Many owners experienced a brief scare last week when new legislation targetting this breed was passed.
A young man walks his pit bull in an İstanbul park. Many owners experienced a brief scare last week when new legislation targetting this breed was passed.

Last week was filled with panic, anxiety and grief for many pit bull owners in Turkey as three ministries announced that they had introduced breed-specific legislation, under which all pit bull breed dogs in the country would be “collected” by municipalities, without specifying what would happen to the dogs afterwards.

Read comments

“She is no different to me than my daughter, I’ve had her for six years,” said Gökhan Sertel, a 42-year-old businessman from İstanbul’s Küçükçekmece district, speaking on the day the ban was first announced. “There is no way I am giving her to anybody,” he said determinedly. However, not all pit bull owners are created equal, developments soon proved. As animal rights groups, activists, veterinarians and public health experts repeatedly made statements slamming the law for violating animal and even human rights, some owners simply let their dogs loose fearing they might get in trouble or have to face the TL 3,434 fine. After all, it is a fact that a particular kind of person is attracted to pit bulls. In less than 48 hours, bewildered pit bulls, dumped by their owners, started roaming the streets of Turkey’s largest cities. One newspaper claimed that a family in İzmir was attacked by one such stray pit bull, although members of the family did not appear to have any visible bite marks or injuries in the pictures. Photographs published in the press showed the family’s young son pointing to a blemish on his face, that looked more like an acne spot than a bite mark from a massive and ferocious jaw, but the story was popular, adding to the pit bull hype.Perhaps it was the threat of mafia bosses, thugs, dogfight fans and in general the kind of people you wouldn’t want to mess with letting their dogs loose on an entire society that helped reverse the ban, but animal rights groups trying to talk some sense into the authorities and hundreds of thousands of people backing animal rights’ groups petitions also seems to have played a role in the reversal. Minister of Environment and Forestry Veysel Eroğlu on Thursday said a circular sent to local authorities had been cancelled and that “we are not going to take anybody’s dog.”

Problems with breed-specific legislation

Experts have pointed out many problems with this kind of legislation, but the fact that it simply does not work is probably the greatest defect. In addition to this, such bans infringe on personal freedoms. According to Professor Tamer Dodurka, head of the İstanbul University veterinary faculty of internal medicine, breed-specific legislation is also a violation of human rights. “What you should do is not ban a particular breed. This is not scientific. The entire world rejects this,” he said. He also noted that past examples in other countries showed that wherever pit bulls were banned, the number of pit bulls in that country rose rapidly. “We always tell people, when you see a dog you think is dangerous, don’t look at the dog’s breed, look at what the owner looks like. If the owner is dangerous, run away,” he added.

Lawyer Ahmet Kemal Şenpolat, head of the Animal Rights Federation (HAYTAP), pointed out other shortcomings of the pit bull ban and problems with breed-specific legislation in general, saying: “The problem here is not the pit bull itself. The problem is that there is no obstacle in the way of uncontrolled breeding and the sale of this breed. The problem is that by banning these animals you are creating the perception in the eyes of society that they are a brand of ‘fighting dogs.’ We had a similar law come out in 2004, and the popularity of dogfights across the country grew following that.”

Like many other experts, Şenpolat also said that it is not the pit bull, but the owners who give them a bad name who are to blame for pit-bull-related attacks. “Dog fighting websites get 10 times more clicks than our website, HAYTAP. There is incredible demand for this online. We as an organization keep appealing to prosecutors to shut these sites down, but the telecommunications law does not allow closing websites with animal fights.”

What to do about dog attacks?

Şenpolat said based on these realities, it was pretty clear what needed to be done. “We would expect the Ministry of Environment and Forestry to make an effort to take the law on animal cruelty from under the misdemeanor code and put it within the scope of the criminal code,” he said.

HAYTAP and other organizations also indicated further shortcomings in the withdrawn regulation, such as the lack of infrastructure and personnel in Turkey to take care of the animals, even if the authorities did manage to collect them all. “We are against them [pit bulls] being raised in urban areas. But these animals will always be illegally bred and used in fights. You see it a lot, they poison stray animals and more strays come back after a while,” Şenpolat added.

The correct method is to keep track of every single animal, which was what the law said specifically of pit bulls and a few other “power breeds” in 2004, but it was not enforced. In fact, as Şenpolat notes, pit bull ownership became much more widespread in Turkey, and pit bulls much more readily available.

A celebrity victim of a pit bull attack, TV host Öykü Serter, whose attack made news headlines in 2007, also says she doesn’t have anything against the breed. “The real problem is with dog owners. They use these dogs for all the wrong purposes. They are messing with the psychology of those animals and torture them,” she said.

A comprehensive study by the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) notes that many other factors besides breed, such as heredity, sex, early experience, reproductive status, socialization and training, might affect aggressive behavior in dogs. No similar study exists in Turkey, but according to CDC findings more than 70 percent of all dog bite cases involve unneutered male dogs. An unneutered male dog is 2.6 times more likely to bite than a neutered dog. A chained or tethered dog is 2.8 times more likely to bite than a dog that is not chained or tethered. Ninety-seven percent of dogs involved in fatal dog attacks in 2006 were not spayed/neutered. Seventy-eight percent were kept not as pets, but rather for guarding, image enhancement, fighting or breeding. Eighty-four percent were maintained by reckless owners — these dogs were abused or neglected, not humanely treated and kept or allowed to interact with children unsupervised.

The figures make clear the correct approach to minimizing dog attacks on humans. As Viktor Larkhill from animal rights group Let’s Adopt! said: “The only way to protect people from vicious dogs is to go after the dogs that are actually dangerous. Dangerous dog laws focus on any dog, of any breed, that has a history of aggression, and on the people who deliberately train and/or use dogs to act aggressively or for criminal activity. It’s time that we stop blaming the wrong dogs and start addressing the real problem: bad owners.”

As seen in the Nashua Telegraph…

By KAREN LOVETT Staff Writer

On a day in early summer, a man and his dog set out for a hike.

The man wore khaki-colored hiking pants and shades, and wagged a black hiking stick.

The dog wore dark red hiking booties to protect his pads, and wagged his yellow Labrador tail.

They ventured to the Wapack Trail in Temple, which features a steep, craggy, somewhat menacing start that eventually settles down into easier pleasantries.

Together, the dog leading the way, they stepped through an easy pathway leading to the sharp verticals.

“Hop up,” the man said repeatedly, signaling the dog to go ahead.

This section was tricky. They carefully hoofed around stony corners and wobbly rocks. They steered around young trees parked mid-trail, and low-hanging branches as threatening as whips.

“Adventure dog!” the man called out with a grin, hoisting himself up a boulder.

On this hike, the Labrador was the leader. The negotiator of risky spots. The navigator of the course.

The man followed merrily, offering unbridled love and showers of “good boy” praise to his best friend.

“Whatcha got, buddy?” the man asked enthusiastically as the dog sidestepped a fat, would-be-ankle-breaker root.

They brushed by smoothly.

Time and again, the team worked up the precarious landscape.

Then, at one point, the dog stopped suddenly, cocking his blond head, seemingly to question the man about a next move.

The man handed his trust to the dog.

“You pick the road,” hiker Randy Pierce said with a smile to Quinn, the Labrador. “You’re the guide. I’m the blind guy.”

Blind spot

Pierce was born in Nashua, but grew up in the northern reaches of New Hampshire. His tiny childhood hometown of Colebrook neighbors Vermont, the border of which Pierce often crossed as a kid to scale Monadnock Mountain in Lemington.

Pierce was an active child, carrying his enthusiasm for sport into adulthood. He played recreational basketball and still follows the New England Patriots with religious fervor. (He was named their “fan of the year” in 2001; he has missed just one home game in 20 years.)

Then, in 1989, at age 22, Pierce was eyeing a blade in a fencing class when his instructor noticed something wrong: Pierce’s blind spot was far larger than it should have been.

The instructor told him to have the problem examined.

Eventually, doctors discovered that Pierce’s optic nerve had swollen because of a mysterious neurological condition. In just a week’s time, Pierce lost all the vision in his right eye and half the vision in his left.

Pierce – who at the time had just graduated from the University of New Hampshire with an engineering degree – said he was terrified.

“My life, in my mind, was coming to a complete end,” he said.

Doctors didn’t understand the cause, even after Pierce spent more than a month at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center.

With one blind eye and tunnel vision in the other, Pierce began to use a cane.

“I became ashamed of it,” he said. “I felt broken, crippled. I had enough vision to see the looks I’d get. … The worst was pity.”

It wasn’t others’ fault for pitying him, he said, but it hurt: He was a capable, adventurous 20-something guy.

Pierce’s blindness grew progressively worse during the next 10 years. Various episodes in 1993, 1996 and 1998 reduced his pinhole vision to mere sensitivity to light and dark.

By 2000, Pierce knew that one day, “The lights wouldn’t come back on.”

He began preparing for complete blindness.

Pierce practiced cooking with the lights off. He started using vocal computer software. He began closing his eyes while traveling on the street, testing his ability to walk in a straight line.

He also took up karate, which he felt would improve his focus, orientation and general body awareness.

Eventually, Pierce, who describes himself as a “high-energy, high-affection dog lover,” felt the next natural step would be to get a guide dog.

In the summer of 2000, he was paired with Ostend, a lovable, reliable golden retriever.

While training with Ostend at a guide school in Oregon, Pierce felt it again: an episode of fogginess in his head, an indicator of bad things to come.

On a day when Pierce and Ostend were practicing their skills on a bus, Pierce’s last iota of vision blurred and faded to black.

He began to cry. Ostend noticed, springing up to rest his head on Pierce’s knee.

For a moment, the man’s sight came back. He glimpsed Ostend’s face.

Then, the world went dark for good.

Subtle communication

Quinn wasn’t trained to be a hiker.

Rather, his primary job is to help Pierce be aware of and avoid obstacles. His methods are much faster than a cane.

For example, if Pierce had to find the front door with his cane, he would scan the whole wall, possibly tripping up other interior doors before determining the real exit.

With Quinn, Pierce can simply say, “Where’s the door?” Then they go there.

“It takes me 15 minutes to get to the bus stop with a cane,” said Pierce, 44. “With Quinn, it’s less than five.”

Pierce, who is 6 feet 4 inches, walks about five miles an hour on the straight and narrow.

But hiking is a different story. In steep areas where a sighted person could achieve one mile an hour, Pierce can travel about a third as fast.

On the mountain, it’s all about subtle communication. Pierce and Quinn operate in ways that a casual observer can’t decipher.

Quinn assesses the whole picture, from ground to the air, looking for barriers. He uses his body to tell Pierce when a single-file approach is necessary.

“His devotion is amazing,” Pierce said. “He’s looking for, ‘Where are my sides? My shoulders, head, knees? Do we have this?’ ”

Then, Quinn picks a route. The metal harness tells Pierce whether the dog is moving left, right, up or down slope. Constantly listening for Quinn’s footfalls as a model for his own placement, Pierce then takes his steps.

Scrambled rocks underfoot are always the hardest part of hiking.

“Every time you put your foot down, who knows what’s going to happen?” Pierce said.

“Quinn evaluates future steps and stabilizes me.”

Earlier this spring, the duo embarked on a week-long excursion across the Pemigewasset Loop, a route along the Twin and Franconia mountain ranges. To give Quinn a break at one point, Pierce had another hiker guide him. They lasted about four steps before tripping.

Quinn works so well, in part, because less is more, Pierce said. The dog doesn’t offer an opinion about whether something is going to be tough or not. He just finds a way.

This kind of thing gets Pierce marveling.

“I’m three times his height, three times his weight and I’m walking alongside him blind,” Pierce said. “He puts himself in jeopardy for me. Imagine doing that for 15 hours?”

On the trail, Pierce’s stream of acclamations to Quinn is nearly constant.

After all, Pierce pointed out, “Which time, when he saves me from falling on my face, does he not deserve praise?”

Partnership sealed

In 2003, Pierce sank into what he called “the lowest point in my life.”

Without warning, the still mysterious neurological disorder flared again, this time attacking his cerebellum – the area of the brain controlling balance. Pierce suddenly found himself wheelchair bound.

Around the same time, Ostend – his first faithful guide of six years – collapsed with a sudden discovery of cancer. He died in May that year.

For the next two years, Pierce worked to dig himself out of the trenches. Through medical treatments, eventual graduation to crutches and finally to a hiking stick, Pierce got on his feet.

“By 2006, I started making good progress,” Pierce said. Losing Ostend, he added, “almost made me more focused. It’s OK to step back, just as long as you don’t lose sight of where you’re going.”

In the fall, the time was right to get a new guide dog.

Pierce connected with Guiding Eyes for the Blind, a guide school in New York. The matching process, he joked, is like “Match.com for dogs” – meaning the profiling is extensive.

Pierce was interviewed about his living habits and needs. With a 36-inch inseam, Pierce’s comfortable stride is a jog for the average Joe – never mind the average four-legged pooch.

Pierce needed a fast-moving pup for his frequent trips to downtown Nashua. And he needed one that was OK with a weekly visit to Gillette Stadium and its 68,000 other Patriots fans – not to mention the away-game tailgating shindigs at Pierce’s Nashua home.

Last, he needed a partner willing to tag along for adventure.

Guiding Eyes seemed to have just the dog in mind when Pierce went to New York in October 2006. Quinn was a 2-year-old yellow Labrador with a quick pace, happy spirit and thwacking tail. A picture from his puppy days shows him perched atop a flight of stairs with a handwritten note: “Stairs? I want to climb mountains!”

After two days of his own training, it came time for Pierce to finally meet Quinn, who bounded across the room to greet his new charge with two kisses.

In the same moment, a partnership was born and sealed.

Positive influence

With a couple years of walking together under their belts, Pierce and Quinn discovered they could pick up the pace.

They could run.

Then, the duo decided to push their limits again: In 2009, Quinn, Pierce and Pierce’s girlfriend, Tracy Goyette, tried hiking.

Pierce met Goyette in 2007 through mutual friends. They discovered a common love for martial arts and the outdoors, among other things.

“I thought, ‘Wow, this guy is amazing. I would love to connect with him,’ ” Goyette recalled.

Sometime later, the pair – plus Quinn – crammed into Goyette’s little MINI Cooper, headed on a 10-hour road trip to Pennsylvania for a friendly camping weekend. The couple clicked.

“He’s been such a positive influence on my life,” Goyette said. “I’ve never met anybody who has encouraged those around him in such a way as to not be nagging, but to inspire people to grow to new heights. …

“I really honestly think that this is a function of who he is. It doesn’t have anything to do with his blindness, but it certainly helps because people see he’s out there earning a second-degree black belt, and he’s out there hiking mountains and running races with his guide dog. It’s like, ‘Geez, maybe I can get off the couch and go to the gym.’ ”

In May, Pierce arranged to hike with Goyette and friends up Welch-Dickey in the White Mountains. It’s Goyette’s favorite hike. At the summit, Pierce proposed. She accepted.

Still, there are some tough aspects to their relationship, Goyette said. For one, when they get married, Pierce won’t get to see his bride.

“It’s a little bit of a sadness, but as far as managing life together, our personalities are so well-suited,” she said. “His health concerns me and I worry about him, but Randy’s an independent guy and he doesn’t want someone to mother him.

“It’s a hard line sometimes to find the balance between being helpful and not being smothering because you care and you worry about people, and that’s a natural instinct. But it’s something that I think we’ve balanced.”

On the other hand, Pierce joked, he also can’t comment on Goyette’s morning bed-head.

“Bad hair days don’t count when you’re married to a blind guy,” she said.

When Goyette started hiking with Pierce and Quinn, she described feeling “frightened at each obstacle, whether it was something for Randy to stumble upon, bash a knee or crack a skull. I was sure that Quinn might miss it.”

Most times, he didn’t.

Quinn isn’t invincible, and Goyette occasionally needs to warn him and Pierce of serious danger. But she also doesn’t want to get in the way of Quinn’s job.

“When I notice a particularly rough spot, I do worry and I pause and look back, ready to chime in with a word of warning,” Goyette described in a blog entry.

“What is my most common sight when I do that? I see Quinn with as much concern on his face as I feel at that moment. I also see this remarkable dog making the right decision most of the time.

“Seeing Quinn’s work day after day does inspire trust and comfort and has taught me, through experience, to believe.”

Last summer, after reaching the top of the Wapack Trail in Temple, Pierce drank in the moment. He’d achieved something new, something that had seemed out of reach.

Maybe, he thought, he could do more.

In September, Pierce, Goyette, Quinn and some friends tried Mount Osceola, a challenging, 4,300-foot climb in Waterville Valley.

The loose rock underfoot tested Pierce’s each step. It was a struggle to make the top.

“I thought about how hard it was, but how satisfying,” Pierce said.

Well, heck.

As a blind man, he’d earned a second-degree black belt in karate. He’d waded through the Everglades in Florida. He’d body surfed in San Diego.

What’s one 4,000-foot climb when he could do all 48 in New Hampshire?

The great 48

One man described himself as former 300-pound couch potato who could barely make it to the refrigerator, let alone hike a mountain.

Somehow, he’d become inspired to climb all 48 of New Hampshire’s 4,000-footers – and in three years, he did.

Another writer described how her grandmother had introduced her to the splendor of the White Mountains, so she climbed them in honor of her ancestor.

A third person described first climbing a 4,000-footer in summer camp, topping his last 50 years later as a retiree.

These are the kinds of stories that Eric Savage reads all the time on applications to the Appalachian Mountain Club’s Four Thousand Footer Committee. As secretary of the committee, Savage has read people’s many reasons for scaling the 48.

Never in his six years, though, has Savage heard of a blind man and his guide dog making the attempt.

While there are no specific records of people with disabilities having accomplished the feat, Savage believes Pierce would be a rarity.

“As far as I know, I don’t have anyone in the club who’s applied with that kind of disability,” Savage said, noting the membership of about 9,400.

Pierce, Quinn, Goyette and a crew of friends – which includes an experienced hiker – plan to become members of that club in time.

They’ve pledged to climb all 48 in the name of their newly formed nonprofit, 2020 Vision Quest. The organization is designed to raise money for the New Hampshire Association for the Blind and Guiding Eyes For the Blind, where Pierce met Quinn.

The quest, Pierce described, “epitomizes using small steps and community to accomplish a grander result.”

Indeed, New Hampshire’s 4,000-footers include some monster peaks, such as the northern Presidentials – famous for their height and upper exposures – and some marathon climbs, such as Mount Isolation.

Every applicant takes varying periods of time to complete the 48, Savage said, but many sort of stumble into it, hiking here and there until they suddenly have 20 done, which inspires them to go on.

Does it surprise him that a blind man and his guide dog would attempt it?

“It doesn’t surprise me at all,” Savage said, adding, “We’ve had 100-odd dogs do it, too.”

Independent goal

This morning, Pierce, Quinn, Goyette and their crew set off for the summit of Mount Washington, the state’s highest peak, grazing the sky at 6,288 feet.

After that, Pierce and Quinn plan to climb the other 47 mountains within the next 10 years.

But in typical Pierce fashion, he wants to do it in half the time.

That way, Pierce and his trusty partner, Quinn – already 5 years old – can finish the quest as a team.

Just the way they started.

When I was a little girl I loved ALL animals. But…my mom was a cat person. We had cats and fish growing up. Until I became a teenager – then I got a horse. But dogs? Never. My mom was afraid of them and thought they were too much work. And my dad, well, he wasn’t truly an animal person. He was always kind to our pets and enjoyed their humerous ways. But if he was on his own he probably wouldn’t have animals. Together they were united on the ‘no dogs’ front.

This doesn’t mean there weren’t dogs in our lives. Family, friends and neighbours had dogs that my sister and I would walk or play with. Once the horses came into the picture there were even more dogs to play with. Dogs and horses go together like peanut butter and jam. I have never known a horse stable that didn’t have at least one dog happily calling it home. A few of them became great friends with me and would go for rides or sleep with me if I had overnight adventures in the horse world.

There was even the occasional lost dog that my sister and I would take home. These dogs were not allowed in the house.  My mom would exhaust all possibilities of finding the rightful owner before bedtime. If that hadn’t been accomplished they would spend the night in the garage. Most of the time she miraculously found their homes. We knew that if the homes weren’t found by the next day the dog would not stay. It would have to be taken to the SPCA. Thankfully this was never the case. All dogs were returned to their owners.

You might suspect that as soon as I was living on my own I took in a dog. It would be a good guess but despite my lack of dogs growing up I had been raised to believe that the commitment of taking in animal was a lifelong one. And even at 20-something I knew I could not take on the responsibility of a companion for the next 15-20 years. I went to school, travelled, moved around, partied and had fun. There were temptations. And more dog friends that I met. There were also hamsters, hedgehogs, pet mice and my sister even had an iguana.

It was in my late 20s that I met my current SO. We had only been together a few months when we walked into a pet store to get a cat tree for my new kitten. This was the kind of pet store that brings in animals from the local shelters to adopt. And there, bouncing around a kennel was bear cub. At least that’s what he looked like. The shelter forms said he was a rottweiler cross but he had massive saucer paws and was covered in thick, long black hair. He stopped everyone in his tracks. He was endearing, enthusiastic, charming and … well he stopped us. The staff let him out and we all played with him. He trotted into the back room and came out with a leash in his mouth. That sealed his fate. My SO and I exchanged a look. I still had the same hesitations I had had all of my adult life. Not to mention this was a puppy. My first full time puppy. We lived in an apartment. It was a dog friendly complex but still – an apartment. And yet, we couldn’t leave him there.

We filled out the paperwork and brought our cat in to meet him the next day as was required by the parent shelter that was adopting him out. They tolerated each other as much as could be expected. And we brought him home.

He was a giant bundle of love. Rolling all over us. Ecstatic at his new found freedom. We lived near Stanley Park in Vancouver at the time and he’d romp on the beach every day. He played with other dogs and smelled everything that came in from the sea. The only thing he didn’t do was potty outside. I didn’t know what to do with him. I read training books. He actually ate one library book on training puppies. Literally.

People gave us all kinds of advice. Eventually I learned he probably had ‘dirty puppy’ syndrome from living his life in a kennel. He assumed it was natural to soil in his home. We’d go outside and wait for him to go. Nothing. We’d bring him in and he’d go as soon as we came back in. We tried to trick him by bringing him in and taking him right back out. Nothing. He’d go on the beach which was four or five blocks from our house. That was fine once or twice a day but every time he had to go? He pooped in the middle of a major intersection once. Just stopped and refused to move until he was done. Another time in front of a restaurant that had patio seating. How embarrassing. I heard about crate training but didn’t know what to think. Some people said it was cruel and others couldn’t give it enough praise.

We had decided that he was actually a Newfoundland cross and I worried about how a crate would affect his growth. I decided not to try it. Now, looking back, I have experience with other dogs and crates and realize this was probably a mistake.

It was years before I learned about clicker training, another method I would now recommend to new owners.

Over time he did learn. But it took a long time. He was probably over a year old before he was really reliable with pottying outside and even then there were accidents. Or he’d show he was upset by peeing on something. But over time even this inclination faded.

The pottying was a big issue for us but other than that he was a very good dog. He learned everything else quickly. He was eager to please and happy to learn. He was sensitive yet independent. And always very gentle.

There are many stories I could share about Maverick. I’ll tell the two that bring me the warmest feelings.

As I mentioned, we lived near Stanley Park, a big beautiful park in Vancouver. Around this park is a ‘seawall’ which is a popular walk between the forest and the sea. My SO and I would do this walk in part, and occasionally in full, with Maverick. SO would walk along the raised edge of the seawall balancing there and Maverick, much like a child, would follow behind him. I was constantly telling both of them to get down. But neither listened. It wasn’t long before Maverick, in his puppy clumsiness, lost his balanced and slid off the far side. The tide was out leaving only the rocky terrain below. It was about an eight-foot fall. I was terrified, convinced he was badly injured if not killed. I peered over the edge and there he lay, motionless, on a rock. SO quickly climbed down and tried to get Maverick up. He didn’t move. I was in tears. SO picked him up and climbed back up setting him on the path. Maverick slowly, and dramatically, stood up. I felt him all over. There didn’t seem to be any tender spots. I coaxed him to walk a few steps. He seemed to have a slight limp. I was near distraught. We were halfway around the seawall and the only way back was to walk. We coaxed a few more steps out of him and he didn’t seem too uncomfortable. We started slowly walking back. Maverick was doddling behind me. This was not his normal gait. Normally he was ahead, or to the side, sniffing and exploring. I kept glancing back and he was always limping. SO started laughing. I was furious! He could be seriously injured! But my SO pointed out that Maverick only limped when I looked at him and that he kept switching feet. That couldn’t be true! I started watching him out of the corner of my eye. He was sniffing and running around on the path behind me. If I turned swiftly to glance at him he’d drop his head and limp again. He had learned quickly that if he acted hurt he would get my full attention and affection!

This attention-gathering characteristic showed itself again a few months later when we took him to a dog park. He was a pushy pup. Confident that all dogs must love him and play with him. Some of the older dogs had little patience for such an annoying puppy. One dog quickly grew tired of his antics and snapped, growling at Maverick. Maverick threw himself on the ground, belly up and started howling and rolling around. He made such a fuss that everyone at this busy park stopped to stare. A few came running over to see if they could provide medical aid. Many people asked us if he was ok and someone even offered to drive us to a vet clinic. SO and I were familiar with this behaviour by now and didn’t want to encourage it by giving him attention. We tried to explain that he was just milking it and really his feelings were just hurt. I’m sure several dog owners thought we were cold and callous and undeserving of such a beautiful puppy. After several long minutes of this temper tantrum Maverick stood up an went searching for someone else to play with.

The years that Maverick was with us were never dull. We moved many times. He lived in apartments, in the country, in city yards…. And he grew. Boy did he grow. If he jumped up on SO’s shoulders he was taller than him at 6′. He was always playful. And always exploring. He did not hesitate to stray from us if we were out hiking or if he thought he could get out of the yard.

We adopted Maverick when he was about three to four months old. We had him for four years. After many moves, many shuffling, dogs coming and going (read future blog entries). We landed in a port city on Vancouver Island. And we were back in an apartment. This time with two dogs including Maverick and a new baby.

Maverick was stressed. His old pottying issues started to come back. He hadn’t been in an apartment since we had first gotten him and we was much bigger now. My SO was working out of town and away most of the month, sometimes for months at a time. I had a hard time getting enough exercise for the two dogs and Maverick, a born wanderer and explorer, showed it in his behaviour. I was constantly cleaning up after him. Even after he’d just been outside. I knew he wasn’t happy. He was great with the baby. Thrilled when we’d go out but even an hour long, off-leash walk didn’t satisfying his needs. We were financially incapable of moving into a larger place. Our neighbour would sometimes help me walk him but it hardly put a dent in what he needed.

I was beyond frustrated. This time I knew about crate training and Maverick was spending time in his crate when I couldn’t be giving him my full attention. But it wasn’t fair to him to spend so much time locked up. Not only was he in a cage but a crate for a dog that size didn’t fit just anywhere and he was isolated as well. After many tears and much regret I tentatively put out some feelers for a new home for him.

We had some interest. A nice man that lived nearby said he’d take him. I was optomistic because he had a great yard and I would be able to see him often. But he only had Maverick a few hours. His older cats were terrified of him and he didn’t think it was fair to the cats to bring in this giant dog.

Another girl took him in to see how things worked out. She also lived close and was very active, frequently spending weekends in the country. Unfortunately despite all this activity his potty issues continued. I think he was stressed by such a change. She also had more rigid training issues than I do and he is a sensitive dog. I think he felt he didn’t respond well to so many rules.

I took him back and I’ll admit I had mixed feelings. As much as I had missed him over the past two months our household had settled into a much calmer routine. I feel guilty expressing that even today but it is the truth and should be shared.

It was a few more months before I found another home that I thought might be appropriate. This was with a girl back on the mainland. She was smitten with his pictures and sounded too good to be true. She was a vet tech that lived on an acreage full of animals. Her other dog was big, not as big as Maverick but she was used to handling large dogs. She had a pond, horses, and all kinds of creatures. He would have free run of the house and the yard through a doggy door and would even go to work with her some days.

She came out to see him one weekend and they both fell in love. She was on the floor with him wrestling and he was pouncing all over her. They laid next to each other and she marveled at the size of his paws. We all knew that this was a good match. He went home with her that day and that is where he remains today.

Since he left us almost two years ago he’s gained another doggy friend. And even saved a dogs life at the vet clinic where she works by donating blood. I get pictures now and then. She’s changed his name to ‘Fish’ because he won’t stay out of her pond. The new, and much smaller dog, has been photographed sitting on his back. He seems content.

I’ve also moved back to the mainland and am in the neighbouring city now. But despite my proximity I haven’t gone to see him. I’m afraid of how I will feel when I see my first puppy again. I have no doubts that he is happy and that he is in a home that suits him far more than ours ever did. Some day I will go. But for now I am content knowing that he is somewhere where he is safe, loved and where he is mentally and physically stimulated like he needs to be.

I’ve made a lot of mistakes with my dogs. With Maverick I went into it without doing research on his breed and without knowing enough about potty training methods. There were other mistakes along the way but those two always affected our relationship and his happiness.

- Shara JJ Cooper

Let me be one of the first to say that feeding a raw diet is on the rise. Why do I say that you ask? Well, the more people I tell about feeding my dogs raw, the less shocked and appalled are the responses that I receive!

I love to share Buddy’s story because not only is it one of pain, countless trials of so many different modern medicine “cures “, and following the sheep in front. But it is also one of triumph. So what if everyone you know feeds kibble (and so what if they feed Iams, Eukanuba, or other very low quality kibbles)? So what if everyone you know vaccinates yearly? So what if everyone you know does everything their vet tells them to do?

So. What.

When Buddy was just three months old, and only two days after arriving at his forever home, he spent a week in the first ICU we could find. He had parvovirus and his outlook was bleak at best. Buddy fought, though, and he came home after a week of not being able to see us, quarantined in the parvo ward.

Sometimes I wish I could say that this was the end of suffering, but really, it was just beginning.  Yeast infections, ear infections, demodex, allergies, compromised immune system, steroid medications, weekly visits to the vet, trying one thing after another after another and again and again and again. Thousands of dollars in medical bills still left us with a very sick dog.

Needless to say I was fed up. It wasn’t that I was spending the money on Buddy- THAT aspect was okay (though not ideal)- what was frustrating was Buddys lack of response to everything the vet told us to try. He was a favorite at that initial animal hospital, but it didn’t mean I wanted him to need to go every week. Being the fed up dog mom that I was, I went to the good ol’ world wide web in search of a new vet, hoping fresh vet blood would help my dog.

The new vet hospital certainly had their work cut out for them. Again, we tried regimens we had previously tried. But this time, the instant we discovered they weren’t going to work, we stopped them. For a long while we did give medications that helped Buddy to feel better. But I found that a dog on steroid medication isn’t himself.

At this point I had started to do some reading about raw diets. I was certainly interested, but I was scared to take such a plunge. I was feeding a high quality dog food, but what if the food was one of the issues? We decided to try elimination diets to see if Buddy got better when certain food items were removed from his diet. After months of feeding new protein and carb sources we were no closer to a remedy.

We had an allergy test done. Of course Buddy had allergies, we had known this for some time. His list of allergens was surprising, but all items we could handle appropriately. We put regimens into place to ensure that fleas would never enter our house or yard (oops- we had a couple breakouts, but we blame the cats!), we took care of the dust mite issue by buying air purifiers and using allergen solution detergent for curtains, bedding, and all household furniture the dogs are allowed to get on. We also started to feed a raw diet.

Scary doesn’t begin to cover it. But beneficial is the word that embodies the experience as a whole. After I began Buddy’s raw feeding regimen, I also sought the experience of a holistic veterinarian.  Bishop Ranch, where Buddy was already being seen, integrates holistic and modern medicine.

After the holistic vet heard our saga, she prescribed a Traditional Chinese Medicine (“TCM”) powder of herbs. Slightly expensive, always smelly, but found worthwhile as it helped Buddy tremendously.  A couple months later another form of TCM was prescribed.

Perhaps all fairy tails have a happy ending as Buddy just recently had his annual check-up at which our modern medicine vet exclaimed he was “healthy”. It’s amazing how much one word can elate a person’s spirit.

There are, and always will be, naysayers. I’ve had people tell me they don’t believe in TCM, saying things like “if it worked so well there wouldn’t be a need for modern medicine” or maybe something like “if you had a broken limb you wouldn’t go to a practitioner of TCM, blah, blah, blah…” I don’t give a hoot what anyone says… I broke the mold to heal my dog and I am never going back.

12th Dec, 2009

Training!

Training!

It’s quick. It’s easy. It’s fun. It’s practical!

Set aside ten to fifteen minutes every day (or twice, or three times each day is even better) to train your dog. Set a goal, keep the rate of reinforcement high, and get to work.
Today Bailey worked on sit stays and heeling. She’s been having issues with left turns on and off. A lot of it is my body cue to turn isn’t always predictable, so I am working on that part, and together we are working on them being a smooth transition. If my cue isn’t timed correctly, she bumps into my leg and stops. My goal for today was two-fold, cue correctly and help her keep working if she bumps me. If she bumped me, I didn’t click, but I did throw food for her. The reasoning behind this is the same reason I give “screw up cookies” in agility. If you give the wrong cue and the dog responds correctly, they are STILL right, so in the words of my agility instructor “reward that!” We had about fifteen repetitions of left turns. She hit me 4 times and by the fourth one she was bouncing at me, it wasn’t such a big deal! This is to help us in a trial, because if I don’t cue it correctly, I still want her to keep working. Her sits were VERY good today. Not a single break and this is while I was working Buzz too!
Buzz worked on sit stays and learning the difference between “down” and “mark” cues. He wants to lie down SO BADLY when I move my left arm any way in the downward direction. This is a good thing, that he’s so amped about performing, but a bad thing in that I need to teach him to mark things (like the jumps in rally since I can’t cue jump verbally, or his dumbell on the blind retrieve, or anything else I’d like to send him to). The session started with me doing limited movements with my left arm. I was almost able to bring it to level with his head by the end of the session, but we didn’t get to the actual marking exercise today. Tomorrow we will work on the actual cue for down, instead of any left hand motion while in heel position!
Also seen here

High levels lead, other toxins found in pet toys

By Christie Keith

November 24, 2009

bigstockphoto_Don_T_Touch_My_Toys__4095949Oh yay. Another thing to worry about. This time, it’s high levels of lead and other toxins found in dog and cat toys.

Via Dr. Eric Barchas on Dogster’s VetBlog, a report from HealthyStuff.org:

HealthyStuff.org tested over 400 pet products, including beds, chew toys, stuffed toys, collars, leashes, and tennis balls. Since there are no government standards for hazardous chemicals in pet products, it is not surprising that toxic chemicals were found.

45% of pet products tested had detectable levels of one or more hazardous chemical, including:

  • One-quarter of all pet products had detectable levels of lead.
  • 7% of all pet products have lead levels greater than 300 ppm — the current CPSC lead standard for lead in children’s products.
  • Nearly half of pet collars had detectable levels of lead; with 27% exceeding 300 ppm — the CPSC limit for lead in children’s products.
  • One half (48%) of tennis balls tested had detectable levels of lead. Tennis balls intended for pets were much more likely to contain lead. Sports tennis balls contained no lead.
  • I guess this is one we can’t blame on the FDA, and yet… the presence of dangerous toxins in everyday items like toys — toys that might be sold for pets, but certainly don’t magically self-destruct if a child starts gnawing on them — is certainly directly related to the almost complete lack of safety regulation on products being imported into this country from places with less than stellar safety and health practices in manufacturing, hello, China.

    Although of course, even children’s toys from China were recalled by Mattel for high lead levels while the 2007 pet food recall was still going on — remember this?

    Think long and hard about all the “Made in China” toys and collars you buy your pets, not to mention the source of the supplements in their food and yours. The reality is, when you decide you’re never going to buy anything made in China ever again, you’d better be willing to starve your pets and yourself, and go naked, because it’s not easy.

    Which seems like a good reason to relentlessly inspect and test everything we import from them, but hey, what do I know? I’m just a pet blogger.

    Ethoxyquin has been banned for use in human foods. It’s used as a preservative and PESTICIDE.

    —–Quote:
    Ethoxyquin is a chemical preservative – and possible carcinogenic – regulated by the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) as a pesticide. While ethoxyquin cannot be used in human foods, it continues to be used in many pet food brands. Ethoxyquin has been found to promote kidney carcinogenesis and significantly increase the incidence of stomach tumors and enhanced bladder carcinogesis, according to several studies.—– (Quotes credited to DanaRVT who does Canine Nutrition Consultations)

    By law, unless a pet food manufacturer directly adds it to their foods, they are not required to list it on their ingredients, even if they KNOW that a supplier is using it in the raw materials they get. TOTW doesn’t add ethoxyquin to their foods, but the fish meal they get in to mix up their batches has it added. Since everytime they were asked in the past their answer was NO… I am really stunned and disappointed.

    Natural Balance uses E. on any fish meal.

    Also of interest, suppliers are NOT required to use ethoxyquin – regulations state that the fish meal must be preserved with an antioxidant, but doesn’t specify which, although they recommend E.
    —–Quote:
    he websites mentions the Code of Federal Regulations, and if you read the actual code carefully, it simply implies that fishmeal/fish scrap on a shipping vessel entering US waters/ports needs to be heavily preserved with an antioxidant, the recommendation being ethoxyquin.—–

    List of Ethoxyquin free foods:

    ANY Natura product (Innova, Evo, California Naturals)
    Blue Buffalo
    By Nature
    Flint River Ranch
    Fromm
    Merrick
    Petcurean
    Timberwolf
    Wellness
    Orijen
    Acana
    Nature’s Variety
    Life’s Abundance
    Halo
    Horizon
    Pinnacle
    Canine Caviar
    Eagle Pack

    For more details see the original post

    Categories